Seeking the Joy in Rain﻿

Seeking the Joy in Rain

6/9/2016

Photographed alongside a farm on the Island of Skye, Scotland

The joy in rain can be seen splashed across the skies as a rainbow. And yet, at first, all I see is the rain-swollen, mud-colored river winding it’s way to Lake Macatawa after spring’s many downpours. Colored with nutrients, excess sediment, and algae, Lake Macatawa is listed by the state of Michigan as impaired, falling outside the standards established by the Clean Water Act. The primary culprit is nonpoint source pollution, largely agricultural runoff.

Riding my bicycle in the country, I am discouraged. Freshly tilled fields are plowed within a couple feet of drainage ditches. I
understand the pressure to make every acre

productive in an increasingly competitive global environment, but the lack of sufficient buffer strips almost ensures the soil, rich with spring fertilizers, will slide unencumbered into the drains and streams that feed Lake Macatawa.

It is hard to find the rainbow. Until I start looking.

In early May, the Environmental Protection Agency awarded the Macatawa Area Coordinating Council $473,111 in Great Lakes Restoration monies to help fund the Macatawa Watershed Agricultural Water Quality Restoration. Supplemented with Project Clarity/Outdoor Discovery Center monies, the grant will focus on implementing best management practices (BMPs) to reduce soil and nutrient losses on fifteen farms used to grow primarily corn and soybeans. The funding spans a three-year time period and will include solutions such as planting crop covers (like oats and winter wheat) during the off-season so live roots help hold the soil; using gypsum as a fertilizer supplement to increase the water holding capacity of the soil; and implementing residue management practices to minimize soil disruption.

But what happens at the end of the three years? Will those farms and the neighboring farms participating in the educational portion of the grant, opt to implement those BMPs permanently? Voluntarily? Will they choose to absorb the incremental cost? And what happens if voluntary programs do not move the needle sufficiently to get our lake within legally acceptable “Total Maximum Daily Loads” of nutrients, the tool used to evaluate the quality of the lake’s water?

According to the Michigan Farm Bureau, in 2014 there were over 54,000 farms generating approximately $101 billion annually to the state’s economy. How will our local, state, and federal governments choose to balance the need to support long-term growth and development in agriculture with the responsibility under public trust doctrine to protect our water? Should taxpayer subsidies to farms be tied to implementing BMPs to ensure we have clean, safe water? Should there be new subsidies? If voluntary programs aren’t effective, should there be mandates?

I don’t pretend to know the answers to these questions. What I do know is that in my community, there are farmers working with leaders from Project Clarity/ODC, the Macatawa Area Coordinating Council, the Grand Valley State University Annis Water Resouces Institute, and Hope College, to find solutions for the lake on which we keep our boat and spend our summer evenings. And that has the potential to be the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.

To make sure elected officials are paying attention to this issue, I sent the following email to my governor, federal and state representatives. Please consider doing the same.

I am looking for your leadership in finding the balance in supporting the growth and development of Michigan’s farming community with the need for clean, safe water. Farm runoff with high loads of nutrients and sediment are choking our lakes and harbors with algae. In this, the Great Lakes state, the quality of our water must be a top priority.

Photographed on the Island of Skye, Scotland

To identify and contact your representatives, click on the following to find direct links to federal and Great Lakes state governments.

What We Can Do

Resources (click on blue for direct link to site):

Aaron Spicer, Agricultural Technician, Macatawa Coordinating Council
Environmental Protection Agency," Implementing Clean Water Act Section 303(d) Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)," http://www.epa.gov/tmdl
Michigan Farm Bureau, "Facts About Michigan Agriculture," http://micifb.com
Project Clarity, "2015 Annual Monitoring Report (Nov. 2015) https://www.gvsu.edu
The Macatawa Area Coordinating Council: A Cooperative Effort Among Units of Government, "MACC Receives Federal Grant to Fund Agricultural Water Restoration," http://www.the-macc.org

4 Comments

Karen

6/9/2016 09:00:04 am

Imaging a discouraged you (riding your bike that day) made me sad. Thank you for caring and for all your research. I wrote a letter--and once again enjoyed your Action Page which is chuck-full of goodness.

Eric Stemle

6/9/2016 09:38:57 am

Mary, one hope that I have is that the Michigan farms are small enough, tied still to families, that we can appeal to our farmers' sense of stewardship. The issue in a state such as California is mega-farming, corporate entities that have little tie to the land. Steinbeck saw that 80 years ago. Maybe the Great Lakes have a better chance.

Your rainbow allusion evokes joy and hope, but there is another way to look at that image (love the photo from the Island of Skye!). If we consider the prismatic effect of a rainbow, we can see two perspectives. One is physical, the breaking of light into a spectrum. You do that so beautifully when you lay out action plans for us. Each hue is easy to distinguish! The other is figurative, as Webster says, "the clarification or distortion afforded by a particular viewpoint." Your clarity comes via your words, but it is informed by your daily immersion into nature. You walk, you bike, you boat. I read about Michigan water--you experience it. Thank for you your efforts to make EVERYTHING clear!

Emilie Vardaman link

6/11/2016 08:17:07 am

My immediate thought was that farmers should simply make a large berm so waters don't flow into the river. My second thought was the farmers should quit using fertilizers. My third was large farms should break back up into small family farms.
As none of these seem likely, and maybe not even workable, I am so glad the farmers have joined, if only temporarily, to find some solutions.
Here, we have one remaining free-flowing river. One. And before summer rains it dwindles to a mere three feet wide.
Developers want to put a housing subdivision along it which will kill it. So we are headed back to court, once again, to save our river. I am so very tired of greed!

Mary Ellen Miller

6/17/2016 10:34:25 am

Grateful that you are not letting your discouragement turn into despair, Mary. Thanks for providing us with the concrete steps we can all take to help. The waters of the Great Lakes region are lucky to have you on their side.

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

My Voice